-
Primary
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale, total of 11 items [ADAS-Cog (11)] at Week 24
-
Primary
Video-referenced Clinicianโs Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) at Week 24
Safety and Efficacy of the Xanomeline Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
- Source
- Publicly Available
- Added
- 16 Jun 2026
- Contributor
- System
- Produced by
- CDISC USDM E2J 0.62.0
- Sponsor
- Eli Lilly
- Protocol ID
- H2Q-MC-LZZT
- ClinicalTrials.gov
- NCT12345678
Downloads
Synopsis
Study
- Study type
- Interventional Study
- Phase
- Phase II Trial
- Therapeutic area
- Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease · Alzheimer's disease
- Indication
- Indication 1 · Indication 2
- Protocol version
- 2
Design
- Design
- Interventional
- Model
- Parallel Study
- Blinding
- Double Blind Study
- Intent
- Treatment Study
- Sub-type
- Efficacy Study · Safety Study · Pharmacokinetic Study
- Arms
- 3
- Epochs
- 5
Participants
- Population
- Patients with Probable Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
- Planned enrolment
- 300
- Planned completion
- 300
- Age
- 50 Year to 100 Year
- Healthy participants
- Patients only
- Cohorts
- POP2 · POP3
Key dates
- Design Approval
- 01 Jun 2006
Objectives and endpoints
-
Secondary
Adverse events
-
Secondary
Vital signs (weight, standing and supine blood pressure, heart rate)
-
Secondary
Laboratory evaluations (Change from Baseline)
-
Secondary
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale, total of 11 items [ADAS-Cog (11)] at Weeks 8 and 16
-
Secondary
Video-referenced Clinicianโs Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) at Weeks 8 and 16
-
Secondary
Mean Revised Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-X) from Week 4 to Week 24
Eligibility
Inclusion 3
-
1
Subjects shall be between 50 Year and 100 Year
-
2
usdm:tag name="StudyPopulation"/> as defined by the NINCDS and the ADRDA guidelines (Attachment LZZT.7)
-
3
usdm:tag name="Activity1"/> score of 10 to 23
Exclusion 1
-
9
Persons who have previously completed or withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating xanomeline TTS or the oral formulation of xanomeline.
No order is declared for these criteria, which USDM permits. Grouped by inclusion and exclusion, then by criterion number.
Study design
| Arm | Screening Screening Epoch | Treatment One Treatment Epoch | Treatment Two Treatment Epoch | Treatment Three Treatment Epoch | Follow Up Follow-Up Epoch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo Placebo Control Arm | Screening | Placebo | Placebo | Placebo | Follow up |
| Xanomeline Low Dose Active Comparator Arm | Screening | Low | Low | Low | Follow up |
| Xanomeline High Dose Active Comparator Arm | Screening | High - Start | High - Middle | High - End | Follow up |
When each stage starts and ends
- Screening
-
StartsInformed consentEndsCompletion of all screening activities and no more than 2 weeks from informed consent
- Placebo
-
StartsAdministration of first dose
- Follow up
-
StartsEnd of last scheduled visit on study (including early termination)EndsCompletion of all specified followup activities (which vary on a patient-by-patient basis)
- Low
-
StartsAdministration of first dose
- High - Start
-
StartsRandomized
- High - Middle
-
StartsAdministration of first dose (from patches supplied at Visit 4)
- High - End
-
StartsAdministration of first dose (from patches supplied at Visit 12)
Interventions
Int Label 1
Int Desc 1
Int Label 2
Int Desc 2
New infusion pump
Infusion pump
Injection
Schedule of Activities
Schedule of Activities — 16 visits
| Activity | Screening | Treatment One | Treatment Two | Treatment Three | Follow Up | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visit | Screen One Screening 1 | Screen Two Screening 2 | Dose Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 6 | Week 8 | Week NPI Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 12 NPI Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 16 NPI Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 20 NPI Week 20 | Week 24 | Week 26 |
| Study day | Day -14 | Day -2 | Day 1 ◆ | Day 15 | Day 29 | Day 43 | Day 57 | Day 71 | Day 85 | Day 99 | Day 113 | Day 127 | Day 141 | Day 155 | Day 169 | Day 183 |
| Window | -4..0 hours | -3..3 days | -3..3 days | -3..3 days | -3..3 days | -4..4 days | -4..4 days | -4..4 days | -4..4 days | -3..3 days | ||||||
| Informed consent | Informed consent at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria | Inclusion/exclusion criteria at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Patient number assigned | Patient number assigned at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Demographics | Demographics at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Hachinski | Hachinski at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| MMSE | MMSE at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Physical examination | Physical examination at Screen One | Physical examination at Week 26 | ||||||||||||||
| Medical history | Medical history at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Habits | Habits at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Chest X-ray | Chest X-ray at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Apo E genotyping | Apo E genotyping at Week 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Patient randomised | Patient randomised at Dose | |||||||||||||||
| Vital Signs and Temperature has its own schedule | Vital Signs and Temperature at Screen One | Vital Signs and Temperature at Screen Two | Vital Signs and Temperature at Dose | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 2 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 4 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 6 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 8 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 12 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 16 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 20 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 24 | Vital Signs and Temperature at Week 26 | ||||
| Ambulatory ECG placed | Ambulatory ECG placed at Screen Two | |||||||||||||||
| Ambulatory ECG removed | Ambulatory ECG removed at Dose | |||||||||||||||
| ECG | ECG at Screen One | ECG at Week 2 | ECG at Week 4 | ECG at Week 6 | ECG at Week 8 | ECG at Week 12 | ECG at Week 16 | ECG at Week 20 | ECG at Week 24 | ECG at Week 26 | ||||||
| Placebo TTS test | Placebo TTS test at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| CT scan | CT scan at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Concomitant medications | Concomitant medications at Screen One | Concomitant medications at Dose | Concomitant medications at Week 2 | Concomitant medications at Week 4 | Concomitant medications at Week 6 | Concomitant medications at Week 8 | Concomitant medications at Week 12 | Concomitant medications at Week 16 | Concomitant medications at Week 20 | Concomitant medications at Week 24 | Concomitant medications at Week 26 | |||||
| Hematology | Hematology at Screen One | Hematology at Week 2 | Hematology at Week 4 | Hematology at Week 6 | Hematology at Week 8 | Hematology at Week 12 | Hematology at Week 16 | Hematology at Week 20 | Hematology at Week 24 | Hematology at Week 26 | ||||||
| Chemistry | Chemistry at Screen One | Chemistry at Week 2 | Chemistry at Week 4 | Chemistry at Week 6 | Chemistry at Week 8 | Chemistry at Week 12 | Chemistry at Week 16 | Chemistry at Week 20 | Chemistry at Week 24 | Chemistry at Week 26 | ||||||
| Uninalysis | Uninalysis at Screen One | Uninalysis at Week 2 | Uninalysis at Week 12 | Uninalysis at Week 24 | ||||||||||||
| Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Dose | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Week 2 | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Week 4 | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Week 6 | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Week 12 | Plasma Specimen (Xanomeline) at Week 20 | ||||||||||
| Hemoglobin A1C | Hemoglobin A1C at Screen One | |||||||||||||||
| Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Dose | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 2 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 4 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 6 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 8 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 12 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 16 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 20 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 24 | Study drug record , Medications dispensed, Medications returned at Week 26 | ||||||
| TTS Acceptability Survey | TTS Acceptability Survey at Week 26 | |||||||||||||||
| ADAS-Cog | ADAS-Cog at Screen One | ADAS-Cog at Dose | ADAS-Cog at Week 8 | ADAS-Cog at Week 16 | ADAS-Cog at Week 24 | |||||||||||
| CIBIC+ | CIBIC+ at Screen One | CIBIC+ at Dose | CIBIC+ at Week 8 | CIBIC+ at Week 16 | CIBIC+ at Week 24 | |||||||||||
| DAD | DAD at Screen One | DAD at Dose | DAD at Week 8 | DAD at Week 16 | DAD at Week 24 | |||||||||||
| NPI-X | NPI-X at Screen One | NPI-X at Dose | NPI-X at Week 2 | NPI-X at Week 4 | NPI-X at Week 6 | NPI-X at Week 8 | NPI-X at Week NPI | NPI-X at Week 12 | NPI-X at Week 12 NPI | NPI-X at Week 16 | NPI-X at Week 16 NPI | NPI-X at Week 20 | NPI-X at Week 20 NPI | NPI-X at Week 24 | NPI-X at Week 26 | |
◆ marks the fixed reference the other visits are counted from.
Other schedules in this design
- Adverse Event Timeline 1 visit ยท 1 activity Entered when: Subject suffers an adverse event
- Early Termination Timeline 1 visit ยท 15 activities Entered when: Subject terminates the study early
- Vital Sign Blood Pressure Timeline 4 visits ยท 4 activities Entered when: Automatic execution
Separate schedules, not part of the visit schedule above.
Protocol document
The full text of the 2 protocol documents in this file.
Protocol_Document_CDISC PILOT - LZZT
Sponsor Confidentiality Statement: | |
|---|---|
Full Title: | Safety and Efficacy of the Xanomeline Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease |
Trial Acronym: | H2Q-MC-LZZT |
Protocol Identifier: | H2Q-MC-LZZT |
Original Protocol: | |
Version Number: | 2 |
Version Date: | 2006-06-01 |
Amendment Identifier: | 1 |
Amendment Scope: | Global |
Compound Codes(s): | |
Compound Name(s): | |
Trial Phase: | Phase II Trial |
Short Title: | Xanomeline (LY246708) |
Sponsor Name and Address: | Eli Lilly, Lilly Corporate Ctr, Indianapolis, , IN, 4628, United States of America |
Regulatory Agency Identifier Number(s): | NCT12345678 |
Spondor Approval Date: | 2006-07-01 |
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
Timeline: Vital Sign Blood Pressure Timeline, Automatic execution
BP Anchor | BP while Supine | BP Stand Up | BP while standing | |
-2..0 min | ||||
Supine for 5 minutes | X | |||
Blood pressure supine | X | |||
Stand for 3 minutes | X | |||
Blood pressure standing | X |
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
To determine if there is a statistically significant relationship (overall Type 1 erroralpha=0.05) between the change in both the ADAS-Cog (11) and CIBIC+ scores, and drug dose (0, 50 cm2 [54 mg], and 75 cm2 [81 mg]). | Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale, total of 11 items [ADAS-Cog (11)] at Week 24 Video-referenced Clinicianโs Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) at Week 24 |
To document the safety profile of the xanomeline TTS. | Adverse events Vital signs (weight, standing and supine blood pressure, heart rate) Laboratory evaluations (Change from Baseline) |
To assess the dose-dependent improvement in behavior. Improved scores on the Revised Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-X) will indicate improvement in these areas. | Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale, total of 11 items [ADAS-Cog (11)] at Weeks 8 and 16 Video-referenced Clinicianโs Interview-based Impression of Change (CIBIC+) at Weeks 8 and 16 Mean Revised Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-X) from Week 4 to Week 24 |
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
Previous studies of the oral formulation have shown that xanomeline tartrate may improve behavior and cognition. Effects on behavior are manifest within 2 to 4 weeks of initiation of treatment. The same studies have shown that 8 to 12 weeks are required to demonstrate effects on cognition and clinical global assessment. This study is intended to determine the acute and chronic effects of the TTS formulation in AD; for that reason, the study is of 26 weeks duration. Dosage specification has been made on the basis of tolerance to the xanomeline TTS in a clinical pharmacology study (H2Q-EW-LKAA), and target plasma levels as determined in studies of the oral formulation of xanomeline (H2Q-MC-LZZA).
The parallel dosing regimen maximizes the ability to make direct comparisons between the treatment groups. The use of placebo allows for a blinded, thus minimally biased, study. The placebo treatment group is a comparator group for efficacy and safety assessment.
Two interim analyses are planned for this study. The first interim analysis will occur when 50% of the patients have completed Visit 8 (8 weeks). If required, the second interim analysis will occur when 50% of the patients have completed Visit 12 (24 weeks).
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
For Lilly studies, the following definitions are used:
Screening is the act of determining if an individual meets minimum requirements to become part of a pool of potential candidates for participation in a clinical study.
In this study, screening will include asking the candidate preliminary questions (such as age and general health status) and conducting invasive or diagnostic procedures and/or tests (for example, diagnostic psychological tests, x-rays, blood draws). Patients will sign the consent at their screening visit, thereby consenting to undergo the screening procedures and to participate in the study if they qualify.
Patients entered into the study are those from whom informed consent for the study has been obtained. Adverse events will be reported for each patient who has entered the study, even if the patient is never assigned to a treatment group (enrolled).
Patients who are enrolled in the study are those who have been assigned to a treatment group. Patients who are entered into the study but fail to meet criteria specified in the protocol for treatment assignment will not be enrolled in the study.
At Visit 1, patients who meet the enrollment criteria of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 10 to 23 (Attachment LZZT.6), Hachinski Ischemia Score โค4 (Attachment LZZT.8), a physical exam, safety labs, ECG, and urinalysis, will proceed to Visit 2 and Visit 3. At Visit 3, patients whose CNS imaging and other pending labs from Visit 1 satisfy the inclusion criteria (Section 3.4.2.1) will be enrolled in the study. Approximately 300 patients with a diagnosis of probable mild to moderate AD will be enrolled in the study.
No content for this section.
Patients may be included in the study only if they meet all the following criteria:
1 | Subjects shall be between 50 Year and 100 Year |
2 | usdm:tag name="StudyPopulation"/> as defined by the NINCDS and the ADRDA guidelines (Attachment LZZT.7) |
3 | usdm:tag name="Activity1"/> score of 10 to 23 |
Patients may be excluded in the study for any of the following reasons:
9 | Persons who have previously completed or withdrawn from this study or any other study investigating xanomeline TTS or the oral formulation of xanomeline. |
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
Not applicable
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
The study will be double-blind. To further preserve the blinding of the study, only a minimum number of Lilly and CRO personnel will see the randomization table and codes before the study is complete.
Emergency codes generated by a computer drug-labeling system will be available to the investigator. These codes, which reveal the patients treatment group, may be opened during the study only if the choice of follow-up treatment depends on the patientโs therapy assignment.
The investigator should make every effort to contact the clinical research physician prior to unblinding a patientโs therapy assignment. If a patientโs therapy assignment is unblinded, Lilly must be notified immediately by telephone. After the study, the investigator must return all sealed and any opened codes.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
No content for this section.
Protocol_Document_CDISC PILOT - LZZT_2
- 0 TITLE PAGE —
- 1 PROTOCOL SUMMARY —
- 1.1 Protocol Synopsis —
- 1.2 Trial Schema —
- 1.3 Schedule of Activities —
- 2 INTRODUCTION —
- 2.1 Purpose of Trial —
- 2.2 Summary of Benefits and Risks —
- 3 TRIAL OBJECTIVES, ENDPOINTS AND ESTIMANDS —
- 3.1 Primary Objectives —
- 4 TRIAL DESIGN —
- 4.1 Description of Trial Design —
- 4.2 Rationale for Trial Design —
- 4.3 Access to Trial Intervention After End of Trial —
- 4.4 Start of Trial and End of Trial —
- 5 TRIAL POPULATION —
- 5.1 Selection of Trial Population —
- 5.2 Rationale for Trial Population —
- 5.3 Inclusion Criteria —
- 5.4 Exclusion Criteria —
- 5.5 Lifestyle Considerations —
- 5.6 Screen Failures —
- 6 TRIAL INTERVENTION AND CONCOMITANT THERAPY —
- 6.1 Description of Trial Intervention —
- 6.2 Rationale for Trial Intervention —
- 6.3 Dosing and Administration —
- 6.4 Treatment of Overdose —
- 6.5 Preparation, Handling, Storage and Accountability —
- 6.6 Participant Assignment, Randomisation and Blinding —
- 6.7 Trial Intervention Compliance —
- 6.8 Concomitant Therapy —
- 7 DISCONTINUATION OF TRIAL INTERVENTION AND PARTICIPANT WITHDRAWAL FROM TRIAL —
- 7.1 Discontinuation of Trial Intervention —
- 7.2 Participant Withdrawal from the Trial —
- 7.3 Lost to Follow-Up —
- 7.4 Trial Stopping Rules —
- 8 TRIAL ASSESSMENTS AND PROCEDURES —
- 8.1 Screening/Baseline Assessments and Procedures —
- 8.2 Efficacy Assessments and Procedures —
- 8.3 Safety Assessments and Procedures —
- 8.4 Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events —
- 8.5 Pregnancy and Postpartum Information —
- 8.6 Medical Device Product Complaints for Drug/Device Combination Products —
- 8.7 Pharmacokinetics —
- 8.8 Genetics —
- 8.9 Biomarkers —
- 8.10 Immunogenicity Assessments —
- 9 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS —
- 9.1 Analysis Sets —
- 9.2 Analyses Supporting Primary Objective(s) —
- 9.3 Analysis Supporting Secondary Objective(s) —
- 9.4 Analysis of Exploratory Objective(s) —
- 9.5 Safety Analyses —
- 9.6 Other Analyses —
- 9.7 Interim Analyses —
- 9.8 Sample Size Determination —
- 9.9 Protocol Deviations —
- 10 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: REGULATORY, ETHICAL, AND TRIAL OVERSIGHT —
- 10.1 Regulatory and Ethical Considerations —
- 10.2 Committees —
- 10.3 Informed Consent Process —
- 10.4 Data Protection —
- 10.5 Early Site Closure or Trial Termination —
- 11 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: RISK MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE —
- 11.1 Quality Tolerance Limits —
- 11.2 Data Quality Assurance —
- 11.3 Source Data —
- 12 APPENDIX: ADVERSE EVENTS AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS - DEFINITIONS, SEVERITY, AND CAUSALITY —
- 12.1 Further Details and Clarifications on the AE Definition —
- 12.2 Further Details and Clarifications on the SAE Definition —
- 12.3 Severity —
- 12.4 Causality —
- 13 APPENDIX: DEFINITIONS AND SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL DETAILS —
- 13.1 Contraception and Pregnancy Testing —
- 13.2 Clinical Laboratory Tests —
- 13.3 Country/Region-Specific Differences —
- 13.4 Prior Protocol Amendments —
- 14 APPENDIX: GLOSSARY OF TERMS —
- 15 APPENDIX: REFERENCES —
Conformance CDISC CORE CDISC Open Rules Engine No issues reported 207 rules 193 passed 14 not evaluated
CDISC CORE
CDISC Open Rules EngineNot evaluated 14
12 skipped · 2 engine errors 14 rules
- DDF00114 Engine error The specified context of the condition is not a valid instance of either the Activity or ScheduledActivityInstance class (the value of the condition's contextIds attribute either matches the id of an instance that is not an Activity or ScheduledActivityInstance, or it does not match the id of any class instance). Failed to execute rule operation. Operation: record_count, Target: None, Domain: Condition, Error: Failed to execute rule operation. Domain Condition does not exist. Operation: record_count, Target: None, Core ID: CORE-000878
- DDF00141 Engine error The planned sex is not specified using the Sex of Participants (C66732) SDTM codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive), and/or neither code nor decode is found in the codelist. Failed to execute rule operation. Operation: codelist_extensible, Target: None, Domain: StudyDesignPopulation, Error: You are trying to merge on object and float64 columns for key 'codeSystemVersion'. If you wish to proceed you should use pd.concat
- DDF00014 Skipped The biomedical concept category does not have any members or children.
- DDF00038 Skipped The scheduled decision instance does not refer to a default condition.
- DDF00044 Skipped The condition assignment's target is the same as its parent.
- DDF00090 Skipped The biomedical concept category is referenced more than once from the same activity.
- DDF00180 Skipped The administrable product property type is not specified according to the extensible administrable product property type (C215479) DDF codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00183 Skipped The reference identifier type is not specified according to the extensible reference identifier type (C215478) DDF codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00199 Skipped The study impact type is not specified according to the extensible study amendment impact type (C215481) DDF codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00207 Skipped The medical device identifier type is not specified according to the extensible medical device identifier type (C215484) DDF codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00223 Skipped The study design's observational model is not specified according to the extensible Observational Study Model (C127259) SDTM codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00224 Skipped The observational study design's time perspective is not specified according to the extensible Observational Study Time Perspective (C127261) SDTM codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00225 Skipped The observational study design's sampling method is not specified according to the extensible Observational Study Sampling Method (C127260) SDTM codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
- DDF00226 Skipped The observational study design's sub type is not specified according to the extensible observational study design subtype (C215486) DDF codelist - codeSystem is not "http://www.cdisc.org", codeSystemVersion is not a valid terminology package date, and/or the code or decode (either as preferred term or as submission value) is found in the codelist (case insensitive) but the corresponding decode or code does not match the codelist value (case sensitive).
This protocol was contributed by a third party and has not been verified. Provided for informational and standards-development purposes only โ see the Disclaimer & Terms of Use.